<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>aC forum: Member of several Companies</title>
  <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/topic/1407/</link>
  <description>Recent posts on topic: Member of several Companies</description>
  <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:53:24 CDT</pubDate>
  
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6773/#post6773</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6773/#post6773</guid>
    <title>Post #4 by viceroy321</title>
    <dc:creator>viceroy321</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="postQuote"><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">wikipedia:</div><br />
The Pareto principle (also known as the 80-20 rule, the law of the vital few and the principle of factor sparsity) states that for many phenomena, 80% of the consequences stem from 20% of the causes.<br />
[...]<br />
It was named after the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed that 80% of income in Italy was received by 20% of the Italian population. The assumption is that most of the results in any situation are determined by a small number of causes.<br />
[...]<br />
In computer science the Pareto principle can be applied to resource optimization by observing that 80% of the resources are typically used by 20% of the operations. <br />
</blockquote></div><br />
<br />
In our context this means:<br />
<br />
<div class="postQuote"><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">Ilija:</div><br />
Every new or existing feature that does not benefit 80% of users should be thrown out.<br />
</blockquote></div></p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:25 CST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6756/#post6756</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6756/#post6756</guid>
    <title>Post #3 by saftogvann</title>
    <dc:creator>saftogvann</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry, but I don't know what you mean by this: &quot;pareto of software (the 80/20-rule)&quot;. Could you explain?<br />
<br />
My guess is that it would be useful for more than me to have this feature, especially for freelancers connected to different groups/companies and for NGOs and voluntary groups where persons often have different roles in different settings.</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:46:44 CST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6720/#post6720</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6720/#post6720</guid>
    <title>Post #2 by viceroy321</title>
    <dc:creator>viceroy321</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>i believe this violates the pareto of software (the 80/20-rule), so it probably won't be added...</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:59:26 CST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6690/#post6690</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/6690/#post6690</guid>
    <title>Post #1 by saftogvann</title>
    <dc:creator>saftogvann</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>A feature I'd like to see is that one person can be a member of several companies. Personally I use aC for managing different projects me and my friends are involved in: A band, a blog and some other stuff.<br />
<br />
The band is one company and the blog another. But one person is a member of both. I'd really like to make this person a member of both companies, as it seems strange adding a person from the blog-company to the band project...<br />
<br />
One way to do this is of course to make one company per person, but this feels wrong, and it is so much cooler to be a member of some unit rather than beeing the member of oneself...</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:11:27 CST</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
