<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>aC forum: Groups</title>
  <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/topic/2050/</link>
  <description>Recent posts on topic: Groups</description>
  <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
  <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:33:28 UTC</pubDate>
  
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/12937/#post12937</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/12937/#post12937</guid>
    <title>Post #6 by Ari Maniatis</title>
    <dc:creator>Ari Maniatis</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have three different concepts for almost the same thing:<br />
<br />
* tickets are &quot;tagged&quot;<br />
* projects are &quot;grouped&quot;<br />
* discussions, files and tickets are &quot;categorised&quot;<br />
<br />
Aren't they all the same thing?<br />
<br />
The difference appears to be mostly in the interface for browsing/searching on things via the categorisation. Something like this:<br />
<br />
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4980/tags/select<br />
<br />
would be brilliant! (you'll need a free account there to see how the tag edit mechanism works)</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:40:56 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/12933/#post12933</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/12933/#post12933</guid>
    <title>Post #5 by betty</title>
    <dc:creator>betty</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>We use groups like this:<br />
Corporate<br />
Small Business<br />
Residential</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:48:17 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9807/#post9807</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9807/#post9807</guid>
    <title>Post #4 by mik</title>
    <dc:creator>mik</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Project groups aren't covered by the demo - can you post more info and some screenshots?<br />
Can you include people in groups regardless of whether they are an owner or client member?</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:15:33 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9759/#post9759</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9759/#post9759</guid>
    <title>Post #3 by HanzGeeratz</title>
    <dc:creator>HanzGeeratz</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Thats clear, thank you lots,<br />
Hanz</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:11:05 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9758/#post9758</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9758/#post9758</guid>
    <title>Post #2 by Ilija Studen</title>
    <dc:creator>Ilija Studen</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hanz,<br />
<br />
You are talking about project groups? That is a way to organize project and you can use it any way - no workflow enforced. We use them to keep development projects apart from other projects (writing, support etc). I know of a company that uses them to group projects per department - every department has a group so they can access only their projects among hundreds of other projects. <br />
<br />
Project &lt;&gt; Group relation is completely optional and if you don't see how they could fit in your workflow ignore them.</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:02:42 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9757/#post9757</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/9757/#post9757</guid>
    <title>Post #1 by HanzGeeratz</title>
    <dc:creator>HanzGeeratz</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>hello,<br />
what is the concept of groups, when do we use that ? <br />
<br />
Greetings<br />
Hanz Geeratz</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:53:11 UTC</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>