<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>aC forum: What sucks most about activeCollab 1 ?</title>
  <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/topic/3046/</link>
  <description>Recent posts on topic: What sucks most about activeCollab 1 ?</description>
  <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:52:08 CDT</pubDate>
  
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14156/#post14156</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14156/#post14156</guid>
    <title>Post #5 by adria.richards</title>
    <dc:creator>adria.richards</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>What I really don't like about activeCollab<br />
-------------------------------------------------------<br />
The complainers who don't life a finger to contribute to the project or community.  Instead they troll and criticize aC.  <br />
<br />
<br />
What I enjoy about activeCollab that keeps me interested and active<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
I've been using activeCollab since 2006.  I paid for 1.0 last fall and don't regret it.  The best thing is the developer.  Ilija has a strong vision where he's taking aC.  I find his communication on the board, in support tickets and through the website overall to be friendly, organized, patience, honest, direct an best of all...he has a sense of humor.  <br />
<br />
Open source and shared code is really about the community and I find the aC crowd (minus the whiners) to be highly technical and &quot;contributive&quot; in nature.</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:28:52 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14152/#post14152</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14152/#post14152</guid>
    <title>Post #4 by kthomas</title>
    <dc:creator>kthomas</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>There are features whose implementation is weaker than I'd like,  and there are lacking features which create some vacuum,  but no,  all in all,  I would not declare that aC sucks.  <br />
<br />
Now as for the questioner...</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:24:33 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14146/#post14146</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14146/#post14146</guid>
    <title>Post #3 by Ilija Studen</title>
    <dc:creator>Ilija Studen</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Just go through Community Support and Feature Requests forums to see what people miss the most. Here are some popular requests:<br />
<br />
- ability to drag and drop tasks<br />
- reply to email notification automatically submits comment<br />
- interface for assigning and subscribing people needs to be more intuitive and smarter<br />
- gantt charts...<br />
<br />
There are also some known bugs that we'll be addressing in v1.1.3. Still, even with missing features and some known bugs I would not say that activeCollab sucks. It just doesn't work for everyone and some things can be improved (that's what new versions are for).</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:22:00 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14143/#post14143</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14143/#post14143</guid>
    <title>Post #2 by River</title>
    <dc:creator>River</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>greedy user, who start such discussions</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:04:38 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14141/#post14141</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/14141/#post14141</guid>
    <title>Post #1 by ISee</title>
    <dc:creator>ISee</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, what do you think?</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:30:39 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>