<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>aC forum: trac/activecollab</title>
  <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/topic/809/</link>
  <description>Recent posts on topic: trac/activecollab</description>
  <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
  <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:32:33 CST</pubDate>
  
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/3763/#post3763</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/3763/#post3763</guid>
    <title>Post #2 by evoque</title>
    <dc:creator>evoque</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Trac == CVS front-end and issue-tracking system<br />
activeCollab == Web-based project management and collaboration system<br />
<br />
I'd say any overlap between the two is wholly dependent on your particular business processes, but as a general rule most folks who use Trac and its ilk use it for software project management, not general project management.</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:16:43 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/3760/#post3760</link>
    <guid>http://www.activecollab.com/forums/post/3760/#post3760</guid>
    <title>Post #1 by businessman</title>
    <dc:creator>businessman</dc:creator>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>I see that for the active collab project you are using trac.<br />
Isn't trac the same type of program as active collab, if so which one is better.<br />
If they are the same type of program, isn't it a competition type of thing.</p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:51:58 CDT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>